In VERY RARE circumstances, ALL of your creditors can pursue you even if you file bankruptcy. Here’s how to avoid those rare but dangerous circumstances.

In my last post I listed three special classes of debts for which you can still be pursued in spite of filing bankruptcy. They are exceptions to the automatic stay, the broad protection from creditors that you get immediately when your case is filed.  But in this post today I’m talking about a circumstance in which the automatic stay does not apply to your case AT ALL, regarding ANY of your creditors. And about another circumstance in which you can lose the protection of the automatic stay 30 days after your case is filed. 

Because of the huge importance of the automatic stay, you absolutely want to avoid these circumstances, as rare as they might be.

For anybody who is thinking about filing a bankruptcy and has NOT had a previous bankruptcy case filed in their name in the last year, and then dismissed, you can stop worrying about this. Or if you have already filed a bankruptcy case recently and I’m getting you worried here, stop worrying if you did NOT have a previous bankruptcy case filed in your name, and then dismissed, in the year before your present case was filed.

But, IF you filed TWO OR MORE prior bankruptcies in the year before your new one, AND they were dismissed, the automatic stay does NOT go into effect with the filing of the new case.  The automatic stay CAN go into effect AFTER the case is filed if certain conditions are met.

Or, IF you filed ONE prior bankruptcy in the year before your new one, the automatic stay EXPIRES 30 days after the filing date, unless certain conditions are met before then. 

The details of the conditions for imposing or preserving the automatic stay are beyond the scope of this post. What IS of immediate and absolute importance is that you must tell your attorney—AT the BEGINNING of your INITIAL CONSULTATION—if you have filed ANY prior bankruptcy cases, and especially any recent ones.

Now if you’re wondering who goes around filing multiple bankruptcy cases in one year?—it happens more often than you might think.  It tends to come up two ways: 1) A person files a bankruptcy without an attorney, gets overwhelmed by the process and doesn’t follow through, so the case gets dismissed. 2) Or a person hires an attorney, signs some papers, and the case gets filed, maybe without the person even realizing it, and then gets dismissed because he or she doesn’t follow through. In either case, eleven months later they’ve forgotten all about it. Or don’t think it’s important.

The point of these anti-automatic stay rules is to stop “serial bankruptcy filers,” the very, very small minority of folks who file multiple cases, arguably abusing the bankruptcy process, usually to repeatedly delay a foreclosure or some other creditor action.  But these rules can also seriously penalize innocent people in situations like the ones I just mentioned.

Avoid this happening to you by 1) thinking carefully about whether there is ANY possibility that you filed a prior bankruptcy case within the last year, and 2) then telling your attorney if there’s ANY chance that you did. If so, there’s a good chance the bankruptcy court can be persuaded to impose or retain the automatic stay, but only if your attorney knows about the issue in advance and determines whether your case so qualifies.

Photo by MSVG.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Of course, I do need to know about actual, ongoing lawsuits, but in this post I’m talking about claims the debtor might have against another individual or against a company.

Why would I want to know about possible lawsuits you might have against others that you never filed in court? Because they are assets. They are assets because, if filed, they might bring in some money to you.

Now, it’s true that court fees, attorney’s fees and expert witness fees might eat up a lot (or maybe even all) of a recovery you might get in a lawsuit, depending on how much in damages you stand to recover. But a danger of not telling the bankruptcy court about your potential lawsuits is that you might no longer have the right to sue after the bankruptcy is over.

This is because a person who is filing for bankruptcy has an obligation under the law to disclose all of his or her assets or potential assets to the bankruptcy court. When you fail to disclose a potential lawsuit to the bankruptcy court but then you later (after the bankruptcy discharge) file that lawsuit, you have taken an inconsistent position – you’ve sworn to a bankruptcy court that you had no assets other than those you disclosed, and those assets didn’t include a potential lawsuit; and yet, you then filed a lawsuit after the bankruptcy based on a pre-bankruptcy claim. The law basically says that you cannot have it both ways.

When you file for bankruptcy, a bankruptcy estate is created. All of your assets, including potential lawsuits, become property of the bankruptcy estate, except for those assets you have managed to exempt. If you do not specifically list and exempt an asset, it is property of the bankruptcy estate. The rule of thumb is that it is always a better idea to list it and exempt it than not to list it at all.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Why do I ask about real estate? For starters, I ask about real estate because the Chapter 7 trustee who reviews your case is likely to ask you at your meeting of creditors whether you’ve ever owned real estate. If you say yes, the trustee will want to know what you did with the real estate, how much it’s worth, and so on. I like to know the answers to important questions like these before they pop up at the meeting of creditors so that if there are going to be any potential problems, we can address them ahead of time.

What are some potential problems with real estate ownership that could crop up? One example is that even in this economy, you might have equity in your real estate – i.e., it might be worth something – and the amount of equity you have in the property can take up some or all of the limited exemptions available to you. This can have an effect on how much property (including personal property) you’d be allowed to keep after the bankruptcy.

Also, if, for whatever reason, you gave away your real estate – including signing it over to someone else (like a relative) just because you couldn’t afford the mortgage payments anymore, you are likely to have a problem. A transfer like this can look like a fraudulent transfer prior to bankruptcy.

In case you’re thinking ” I didn’t commit fraud,” the term “fraudulent transfer” as used in the bankruptcy setting is a specific legal term that has a specific meaning and is defined broadly in the law. It does not necessarily require intent to commit fraud. It’s just that Congress decided it didn’t like the idea of people dumping assets before filing, probably because it didn’t want people trying to look poorer when they had assets they could have sold to pay their debts but gave away those assets instead.

As a result, I like to ask people about real estate ownership. In case you are thinking of not disclosing current or prior real estate ownership to your attorney, think again – the trustee can take steps to independently research your property ownership situation and find things out. It’s better for everyone that you disclose everything to your attorney so that they can help you figure out the best course of action before you file for bankruptcy.

If you are in NJ and thinking of filing for bankruptcy, consider calling Jennifer Weil for a free telephone consultation to discuss your financial situation at 201-676-0722.

Photo by The-Lane-Team.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

This is what something called “exemptions” are for. The way I explain it to clients is this: When you file for bankruptcy, something called the “bankruptcy estate” is created, kind of like the estate that is created when someone dies. Everything in the that estate temporarily comes under the Chapter 7 trustee‘s control. The trustee can sell estate assets to pay off your creditors. If something is NOT in the bankruptcy estate, it will not come under the trustee’s control.

How do you keep your stuff out of the bankruptcy estate? You list all it in your filing. Then you cite to the statutes allowing you to exempt each item from the estate. The laws allowing you to keep property out of the bankruptcy estate are generally called “exemptions”.

Does that mean you can exempt anything from the bankruptcy estate, no matter how expensive the it is? NO. Unfortunately not. Exemptions are limited. And they vary greatly by state.

How are exemptions limited? Generally, they are limited by type of property and by amount. For example, you might find that the statute that applies to jewelry might be limited in amount to $1500. This means you could exempt only $1500 worth of jewelry from your bankruptcy estate (that’s just an example – I made it up, so don’t rely on that statement for jewelry!). Limitations like this can make it difficult (and sometimes impossible) to exempt very valuable items like real estate, newer cars, or valuable collectors’ items.

How do you value your items? Generally speaking, you value your property by determining its resale value – how much could you get for it at a garage sale or on an auction website?

How do I exempt items that I don’t want to list in my papers? You don’t. Unlisted property is not exempted.

The bottom line is that you need to speak to a bankruptcy attorney in the state where you live to find out what the exemptions limitations are. And don’t make the mistake of transferring property to someone else just to keep it out of the bankruptcy estate.

If you are in New Jersey and need a bankruptcy attorney for a potential Chapter 7, please call Jennifer Weil at 201-676-0722 for a free telephone consultation or email me at jweil@jenlawyer.com.

Photo by infomatique.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Planning on transferring your largest asset to a relative just before filing for bankruptcy so that the bankruptcy court can’t get to it? As a bankruptcy lawyer, I must say – PLEASE DON’T. It’s a bad idea because it can really get you into trouble and it can deny you your ultimate goal of getting your debts discharged.

The Bankruptcy Code contains a section (727) allowing the Bankruptcy Court to deny a discharge to debtors who transferred, destroyed, or concealed their own property within a year before filing for bankruptcy. Debtors also should not mess around with their property right after filing for bankruptcy – wait until the discharge comes through.

The reason why is that, especially since the 2005 change in the bankruptcy law was enacted, the courts have been cracking down on bankruptcy fraud. The court doesn’t like it when you try to hide assets. They don’t think of your moving your property around to avoid losing it in bankruptcy as ‘innocent,’ even if you do.

In fact, if a debtor does enough things that the court doesn’t like, it may see the entire bankruptcy filing as abusive.

Besides, if you really have assets worth so much that you can’t exempt them from the bankruptcy estate, you may be able to save them by filing a Chapter 13 instead of a Chapter 7. Talk with a lawyer about your options – just don’t transfer any property around before doing so!

In New Jersey and looking at bankruptcy as an option? Call a New Jersey bankruptcy lawyer at 201-676-0722.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Justices Seem to Frown on Law Muzzling Lawyers (blogs.wsj.com)

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Which debts should you put in the bankruptcy and which ones should you leave out?

Answer: You are required to list all of your debts in your bankruptcy papers! It is a common notion that you are allowed to keep some debts out of your bankruptcy by not listing them – but this could not be further from the truth.

Don’t forget, you are signing your bankruptcy papers under penalty of perjury, which means that you could be criminally prosecuted if you fail to disclose information on those papers. These papers require you to list complete information, including “all” of your debts.

What if you accidentally leave out some piece of information? Then you should tell your lawyer as soon as you realize your mistake, because you may be able to amend the filed bankruptcy papers. You may be required to pay an extra fee to the Bankruptcy Court.

And don’t forget to list all debts you may owe to friends and relatives. Many people do not think about listing debts to friends and relatives, because they don’t consider them to be the same type of debt as the credit card debt they are so worried about. And it’s true – debts owed to friends and relatives are different, but that does not mean they shouldn’t be listed in your bankruptcy papers.

If you are seeking bankruptcy advice in northern or central New Jersey, call Jennifer Weil at 201-676-0722 or send an email to: weilattorney@gmail.com.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Personal Bankruptcy Filings Soar (online.wsj.com)
• 2009 Consumer bankruptcies top 1 million (money.cnn.com)

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

What is an abusive bankruptcy filing? When does a bankruptcy court consider a debtor’s Chapter 7 filing to be an abuse of the bankruptcy process?

A bankruptcy court will look at whether the person filing the bankruptcy acted in bad faith and at the entire circumstances surrounding the debtor’s financial situation.

A Florida court addressed this issue in a recent case. Not only were the debtors living what the court considered to be “an extravagant lifestyle” both before and after their filing, but they also failed to disclose all relevant information in their bankruptcy filing.

Among other factors, the court found the following to be especially significant – the debtors:
1) Initiated a lease on a luxury car – an Infiniti – the month before filing for bankruptcy;
2) Timed the filing to be right before a significant raise in income;
3) Had excessive withholding of their Federal taxes and increased 401(k) contributions;
4) Transferred property and/or money right before and after filing for bankruptcy;
5) Tried to hide cash from the bankruptcy court; and
6) Spent a lot of money on day trading, brokerage fees, restaurants, and non-essential purchases.

The court also examined whether the debtors were able to pay their unsecured debts. With disposable income of over $3000 per month left over after monthly expenses, the court found that yes, these debtors would be able to pay back about 54% of their unsecured debts over about 60 months.

Primarily because the debtors could repay a significant portion of their unsecured debt, the court found that it would be an abuse of Chapter 7 to give them relief under that chapter. But the court took other factors into account, such as:
1) One of the debtors was experienced in financial matters and they both had experience with Chapter 7;
2) The debtors timed their filing to take place just before a raise in income;
3) They transferred money and/or property before and after their bankruptcy filing;
4) They made no effort to reduce expenses and live “a luxurious lifestyle”;
5) They decided to keep and pay on 3 luxury vehicles that had no equity;
6) They make large mortgage payments on a house that has no equity;
7) The debtors increased their monthly vehicle obligations right before filing;
The debtors provide a rent-free home to two relatives, whose utilities they also pay; and
9) Their bankruptcy filing was not the result of an unexpected or catastrophic event.

The debtors’ Chapter 7 case was dismissed and they were given time to convert their case to an appropriate chapter of the Bankruptcy Code.

The factors listed above, taken together, are enough to probably make any bankruptcy court sit up and take notice – in a bad way. The existence of just one of these factors might not be enough to lead to dismissal of a Chapter 7 case, but it really depends on the individual facts of each case.

This post is based on In re Ricci, Case No. 6:09-bk-00914-ABB, (Bankr., Middle Dist. Fla., Orlando Div. 2009).

If you are looking for a New Jersey bankruptcy lawyer, please call (201) 676-0722.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Bankruptcy filings up 22% in August vs. last year (abcnews.go.com)

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.