<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hoboken Bankruptcy Attorneymedical bankruptcy | New Jersey bankruptcy attorney &amp; New Jersey bankruptcy lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jenlawyer.com/category/medical-bankruptcy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jenlawyer.com</link>
	<description>New Jersey bankruptcy lawyer Jennifer Weil represents Chapter 7 bankruptcy clients living in northern New Jersey counties, including Hudson County, Essex County, Bergen County, Passaic County, Union County, Morris County, and Sussex County.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 19:58:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is relief on the way for &#8216;medical debtors&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://jenlawyer.com/102/is-relief-on-the-way-for-medical-debtors/</link>
		<comments>http://jenlawyer.com/102/is-relief-on-the-way-for-medical-debtors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jweil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[medical bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S. 1624]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenlawyer.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Image via Wikipedia



This week, the Senate Judiciary Administrative Oversight and The Courts Subcommittee held a hearing on the Medical Bankruptcy Fairness Act of 2009 (S. 1624), which is a new bill geared toward making it easier for people with medical debt to file for bankruptcy, by removing some of the current burdens from those debtors.
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl style="width: 310px;" class="wp-caption alignright">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Senwhitehouse.jpg"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/97/Senwhitehouse.jpg/300px-Senwhitehouse.jpg" alt="Sheldon Whitehouse" title="Sheldon Whitehouse" height="380" width="300"></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Senwhitehouse.jpg">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>This week, the Senate Judiciary Administrative Oversight and The Courts Subcommittee held a hearing on the <a class="zem_slink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_debt" title="Medical debt" rel="wikipedia">Medical Bankruptcy</a> Fairness Act of 2009 (<a id="aptureLink_gN6SFRxMMl" href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1624/text">S. 1624</a>), which is a new bill geared toward making it easier for people with medical debt to file for bankruptcy, by removing some of the current burdens from those debtors.</p>
<p>The hearing begun with a debate over a Harvard study showing that 60% of bankruptcy filers filed for bankruptcy at least in part because of medical debt.  This debate focused on the legitimacy of the study&#8217;s methodology and whether there are actually more medical debts now than a decade ago.</p>
<p>Of course, the debate quickly evolved &#8211; or devolved &#8211; into a debate on the legitimacy of health care reform in America.</p>
<p>Which is ironic, given that the bill&#8217;s existence seems to make the point that if we can&#8217;t have thorough health care reform (and it looks unlikely from where I&#8217;m sitting), then let&#8217;s at least make it easier for people who are overburdened with medical debt to discharge their debt in bankruptcy.  If the U.S. passed a good health care reform bill that worked, this medical bankruptcy bill would probably be unnecessary because medical debts would not be as prevalent and/or as burdensome as they are for people today.</p>
<p>Specifically, the bill would <a id="aptureLink_o9fDnUm6Zp" href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1624/text?version=is&amp;nid=t0:is:36">remove</a> the credit counseling requirement for medical debtors; would enable these debtors to exempt up to <a id="aptureLink_mOlTOL75Ou" href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1624/text?version=is&amp;nid=t0:is:29">$250,000</a> in value of their real or personal property from the bankruptcy estate (so that property up to that value would not be sold by the trustee); and would make <a id="aptureLink_0t4pcSWCDY" href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1624/text?version=is&amp;nid=t0:is:42">attorney&#8217;s fees</a> incurred as the result of the medical bankruptcy non-dischargeable by the bankruptcy so that debtors could take more time paying off those fees.  The term <a id="aptureLink_s45OdJj7BR" href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1624/text?version=is&amp;nid=t0:is:18">&#8220;medical debt&#8221;</a> is fairly broad, meant to include debt incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a medical condition.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll place a widget on the sidebar of the blog to help keep track of this interesting piece of legislation.<br />
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2009/10/21/21343/137">&#8220;Yeah, That Number is Zero&#8221;</a> (mydd.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2010100985_apusbankruptcymedicalbill.html?syndication=rss">Woman who lost son fights for bankruptcy changes</a> (seattletimes.nwsource.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://frugaldad.com/2009/09/25/medical-bankruptcy/">Medical Expenses A Common Cause Of Bankruptcy</a> (frugaldad.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/10/21/early-morning-swim-sen-al-franken-vs-hudson-institute-propagandist-on-medical-bankruptcies/">Early Morning Swim: Sen. Al Franken vs. Hudson Institute Propagandist on Medical Bankruptcies</a> (firedoglake.com)</li>
</ul>
<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/e3e2c596-4c85-4755-b9d5-11109d0b5fc8/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img style="border: medium none ; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e3e2c596-4c85-4755-b9d5-11109d0b5fc8" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jenlawyer.com/102/is-relief-on-the-way-for-medical-debtors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

