Tag Archives: debt repayment

Should You Use Your 401(k) to Pay Off Credit Card Debt? The Truth About Retirement Savings and Debt Relief

Are you considering using your 401(k) to pay off credit card debt? While some financial experts may suggest this as a solution, it is not always the best option. In many cases, using your retirement savings to pay off credit card debt can have negative consequences and end up depriving future you of the funds you will need for basic living expenses after retirement.

Is it a good idea to use your 401(k) to pay credit card debt?

Your 401(k) contains the money that you will need in order to live after retirement.

Instead, bankruptcy may be a better, cheaper solution for those who cannot afford to pay back their debts. In New Jersey, bankruptcy laws allow individuals to keep their 401(k) money untouched throughout the process. This means that, with the help of a bankruptcy attorney, you can achieve debt relief and protect your retirement savings at the same time.

It is important to carefully consider your financial situation and weigh the costs and benefits of each option before making a decision. Dipping into your 401(k) may seem like a quick fix, but it can have long-term consequences. Bankruptcy, on the other hand, is a solution proposed by Federal law for individuals who cannot afford to pay back their debts.

In conclusion, if you are struggling with credit card debt, it is best to consider bankruptcy as a solution before using your 401(k) to pay off your debts. With the help of a bankruptcy attorney, you can achieve debt relief, protect your retirement savings, and start fresh towards a financially stable future.

Not sure if bankruptcy is right for you? Well, it’s not right for everyone, but it’s a great solution for a lot of people. Schedule a free telephone appointment to discuss your unique debt situation with attorney Jennifer Weil at my Setmore page.

Would you like to repay Aunt Sally before filing bankruptcy? Read this first.

cover of the 1906 first edition
Image via Wikipedia

The whole issue of whether you should repay someone to whom you owe money before you actually file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy is more complex than it looks at first glance. I introduced the issue in a previous post about repaying debts before bankruptcy, but there is a lot of detail here that is worth examining.

You may recall from my previous post that if you repay someone you owe money (whether it’s American Express or your Aunt Sally) just before filing for bankruptcy, and the total repayment is $600 or more, the bankruptcy trustee could take back that money from your creditor.

The trustee will look back only 90 days before your filing to see if you repaid any ordinary creditors, such as American Express. But for creditors like your Aunt Sally, the trustee will look back a year before your filing for repayments that they can take back. If the trustee finds loan repayments and takes them back, they can be used to repay your other creditors. The money doesn’t go back to you.

A loan repayment made before bankruptcy that the trustee can take back is known as a “preference” or a “preferential transfer.”

But even when the trustee decides that a payment made to a creditor before a bankruptcy filing was a preference that they can take back, there are defenses that might be applicable. Two of these defenses are: 1) The earmarking defense and 2) The new value defense.

The earmarking defense is available when someone provides you with money to re-pay one of your existing creditors.

In a recent decision the Third Circuit Court of Appeals found that certain things need to be present for the earmarking defense to work: 1) An agreement between you (the debtor) and the person providing you with the money stating that the new money will be used to pay the prior debt; 2) Performance of the terms of the agreement; and 3) This transaction does not reduce the value of the debtor’s estate.

The idea behind the earmarking defense is that the debtor never had an interest (in the sense of a property interest) in the funds to begin with.

The second defense is the “new value” defense. In the same decision mentioned earlier, the Third Circuit said that for the new value defense to apply, you need: 1) A preferential transfer; 2) After receiving the preferential transfer, the creditor makes a new loan to the debtor – this new loan must be unsecured; and 3) As of the bankruptcy filing date, the debtor has not yet repaid the new loan to the creditor.

An example of when the new value defense is available would be when you repay your Aunt Sally the $2500 she loaned you and then your Aunt Sally makes a brand new $2500 loan to you that you had not yet repaid by the time you filed for bankruptcy. It’s basically like reversing the loan repayment.

The Third Circuit decision I referred to above is Shubert v. Lucent Techs. Inc. (In re Winstar Communs., Inc.), 554 F.3d 382 (3d Cir. 2009).

If all this is confusing to you and you don’t know what to do, remember this: Seek advice from a bankruptcy attorney before repaying any loans to anyone in any amount, whether it’s American Express or your Aunt Sally or anyone in between! If you’d like, give me a call at 201-676-0722.

  • Numerous Preference Actions Brought in Two Large Bankruptcy Cases (netdocketsblog.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]