Tag Archives: wage garnishment

When to consult a student loan lawyer

Sometimes it’s obvious when you need to see a lawyer who practices student loan law:  When you are being sued, when your wages are being garnished, when some form of collection activity is being threatened or has already been instituted. But “an ounce of  prevention is worth a pound of cure,” as the saying, attributed to Benjamin Franklin, goes. Franklin’s advice on firefighting is equally applicable to debt payments, especially student loans, since student loans are usually not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

When you find yourself in a situation where you are no longer able to regularly and reliably make your student loan payments on time, it’s probably time to find a student loan lawyer.  Someone who practices in the area of student loan debt can help explore and explain your options to you.

Exploring your options with student loans necessarily begins with finding out exactly what type of student loan you are dealing with.  Many people are unaware of exactly the kind of loans they have, or they think they know but they may be mistaken.  Also, some people have different kinds of loans – private, Federal, state – making it difficult to sort out what is going on with all of them.

Honestly, whether anything at all can be done to make your student loan payments more affordable depends almost entirely on the type of loan you have.  So when a lawyer asks you what type of loan you have and you are unsure, please  understand that the answer to this question is of utmost importance and that your lawyer will likely do whatever it takes to find out this information.  Surprisingly, it may take a bit of research and digging to discover the origin of your particular student loans, so unless you are absolutely certain about what type of student loan you have, your attorney may have to spend some time finding out.

In short – seek out legal help, be willing to explore your options, have patience.  Feel free to call me about your student loan problems if you are in New Jersey, at (201) 676-0722.

Photo credit: variationblogr

Tip income can’t necessarily be garnished in New Jersey

I have to admit, I picked this case for this post mainly because of its cool name, Big M, Inc. t/a Annie Sez v. Texas Roadhouse Holding, LLC. But it also has something interesting to say about debt collection.

The New Jersey Supreme Court decided Big M on July 16, 2010. The issue in the case was whether tips and gratuities are subject to garnishment. As you may recall, a garnishment can happen when a debt collector who has a judgment against you gets a court order to take part of your pay to satisfy the judgment.

Big M involved a waitress working for Texas Roadhouse Holding, LLC whose wages were being garnished. When her creditor, Big M, got a check for only $4.21 from its $672 wage garnishment, it sued her employer. In the course of deciding the case, the trial court judge determined that tips placed on credit cards are garnishable, but cash tips are not. Then the New Jersey Supreme Court considered the case on appeal.

Looking at both New Jersey law and the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (CCPA), the court did not find any law directly speaking to the issue of whether tips were subject to garnishment. So it examined an opinion letter and field operations handbook from the Department of Labor, which enforces the CCPA, and found the opinion that tips, whether paid in cash or charged, are not subject to garnishment. Although the New Jersey Supreme Court is not required to follow a Department of Labor opinion, the court chose to give the opinion consideration and deference.

Big M, the creditor, argued that all tips should be subject to garnishment because they are taxable income for state and federal tax purposes. The court did not find this argument persuasive because the process of counting and recording tip income and reporting it for tax purposes does not allow the employer to exercise enough control over tip income to make it garnishable. The whole idea behind wage garnishment is to capture the income while it is still in the employer’s hands, before it gets paid to the employee.

The court held that the amount of control an employer exercises over tip income determines whether those tips are subject to wage garnishment. If the employer pools all the tips and then divides the pooled amount amongst the employees, then tip income could be garnished. But if the tips are generally paid directly to the employee, even if the tips are charged on a credit card, they are not subject to garnishment.

Photo by respres.