Tag Archives: New Jersey

Tip income can’t necessarily be garnished in New Jersey

Leave a reply

I have to admit, I picked this case for this post mainly because of its cool name, Big M, Inc. t/a Annie Sez v. Texas Roadhouse Holding, LLC. But it also has something interesting to say about debt collection.

The New Jersey Supreme Court decided Big M on July 16, 2010. The issue in the case was whether tips and gratuities are subject to garnishment. As you may recall, a garnishment can happen when a debt collector who has a judgment against you gets a court order to take part of your pay to satisfy the judgment.

Big M involved a waitress working for Texas Roadhouse Holding, LLC whose wages were being garnished. When her creditor, Big M, got a check for only $4.21 from its $672 wage garnishment, it sued her employer. In the course of deciding the case, the trial court judge determined that tips placed on credit cards are garnishable, but cash tips are not. Then the New Jersey Supreme Court considered the case on appeal.

Looking at both New Jersey law and the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (CCPA), the court did not find any law directly speaking to the issue of whether tips were subject to garnishment. So it examined an opinion letter and field operations handbook from the Department of Labor, which enforces the CCPA, and found the opinion that tips, whether paid in cash or charged, are not subject to garnishment. Although the New Jersey Supreme Court is not required to follow a Department of Labor opinion, the court chose to give the opinion consideration and deference.

Big M, the creditor, argued that all tips should be subject to garnishment because they are taxable income for state and federal tax purposes. The court did not find this argument persuasive because the process of counting and recording tip income and reporting it for tax purposes does not allow the employer to exercise enough control over tip income to make it garnishable. The whole idea behind wage garnishment is to capture the income while it is still in the employer’s hands, before it gets paid to the employee.

The court held that the amount of control an employer exercises over tip income determines whether those tips are subject to wage garnishment. If the employer pools all the tips and then divides the pooled amount amongst the employees, then tip income could be garnished. But if the tips are generally paid directly to the employee, even if the tips are charged on a credit card, they are not subject to garnishment.

Photo by respres.

Will they take my property after I file bankruptcy?

1 Reply
Exempt
Image via Wikipedia

One reason people find themselves in the position of wanting to transfer their assets before filing for bankruptcy is that they are afraid the bankruptcy trustee will take their stuff after they file. But you might not need to worry about that, especially in New Jersey.

Why not? Because you might be able to declare and exempt all (or most) of your property.

What does it mean to “exempt” your property? Generally, once you file for bankruptcy, a “bankruptcy estate” is created, which contains all of your non-exempt property. The trustee can decide what to do with the property in the bankruptcy estate – such as whether to sell it for the benefit of your creditors.

A bankruptcy “exemption” refers to the legal means of keeping your property outside of the bankruptcy estate.

In order to claim an exemption for property you own, you specifically list the property on the bankruptcy papers, the property’s value, and the specific statute section allowing you to exempt that piece of property. This process should be used for all property – including all personal property, such as furniture – so that the trustee cannot claim it for the bankruptcy estate. If you don’t list it and exempt it, you may lose it.

New Jersey gives you the choice to use either the Federal exemptions or the New Jersey exemptions. And the Federal exemptions are quite generous.

In New Jersey and looking at a 7? Call me at 201-676-0722.

Related articles by Zemanta
  • The New Bankruptcy: Will It Work for You? by Stephen Elias Attorney (slideshare.net)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

How to choose which debts to list in your bankruptcy papers

Leave a reply
The third wheel 106/365 8/15/08
Image by mollyjolly via Flickr

Which debts should you put in the bankruptcy and which ones should you leave out?

Answer: You are required to list all of your debts in your bankruptcy papers! It is a common notion that you are allowed to keep some debts out of your bankruptcy by not listing them – but this could not be further from the truth.

Don’t forget, you are signing your bankruptcy papers under penalty of perjury, which means that you could be criminally prosecuted if you fail to disclose information on those papers. These papers require you to list complete information, including “all” of your debts.

What if you accidentally leave out some piece of information? Then you should tell your lawyer as soon as you realize your mistake, because you may be able to amend the filed bankruptcy papers. You may be required to pay an extra fee to the Bankruptcy Court.

And don’t forget to list all debts you may owe to friends and relatives. Many people do not think about listing debts to friends and relatives, because they don’t consider them to be the same type of debt as the credit card debt they are so worried about. And it’s true – debts owed to friends and relatives are different, but that does not mean they shouldn’t be listed in your bankruptcy papers.

If you are seeking bankruptcy advice in northern or central New Jersey, call Jennifer Weil at 201-676-0722 or send an email to: weilattorney@gmail.com.

Related articles by Zemanta
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

How to recognize an abusive bankruptcy filing

Leave a reply
Infiniti G37
Image by BulaPhotography via Flickr

What is an abusive bankruptcy filing? When does a bankruptcy court consider a debtor’s Chapter 7 filing to be an abuse of the bankruptcy process?

A bankruptcy court will look at whether the person filing the bankruptcy acted in bad faith and at the entire circumstances surrounding the debtor’s financial situation.

A Florida court addressed this issue in a recent case. Not only were the debtors living what the court considered to be “an extravagant lifestyle” both before and after their filing, but they also failed to disclose all relevant information in their bankruptcy filing.

Among other factors, the court found the following to be especially significant – the debtors:
1) Initiated a lease on a luxury car – an Infiniti – the month before filing for bankruptcy;
2) Timed the filing to be right before a significant raise in income;
3) Had excessive withholding of their Federal taxes and increased 401(k) contributions;
4) Transferred property and/or money right before and after filing for bankruptcy;
5) Tried to hide cash from the bankruptcy court; and
6) Spent a lot of money on day trading, brokerage fees, restaurants, and non-essential purchases.

The court also examined whether the debtors were able to pay their unsecured debts. With disposable income of over $3000 per month left over after monthly expenses, the court found that yes, these debtors would be able to pay back about 54% of their unsecured debts over about 60 months.

Primarily because the debtors could repay a significant portion of their unsecured debt, the court found that it would be an abuse of Chapter 7 to give them relief under that chapter. But the court took other factors into account, such as:
1) One of the debtors was experienced in financial matters and they both had experience with Chapter 7;
2) The debtors timed their filing to take place just before a raise in income;
3) They transferred money and/or property before and after their bankruptcy filing;
4) They made no effort to reduce expenses and live “a luxurious lifestyle”;
5) They decided to keep and pay on 3 luxury vehicles that had no equity;
6) They make large mortgage payments on a house that has no equity;
7) The debtors increased their monthly vehicle obligations right before filing;
8) The debtors provide a rent-free home to two relatives, whose utilities they also pay; and
9) Their bankruptcy filing was not the result of an unexpected or catastrophic event.

The debtors’ Chapter 7 case was dismissed and they were given time to convert their case to an appropriate chapter of the Bankruptcy Code.

The factors listed above, taken together, are enough to probably make any bankruptcy court sit up and take notice – in a bad way. The existence of just one of these factors might not be enough to lead to dismissal of a Chapter 7 case, but it really depends on the individual facts of each case.

This post is based on In re Ricci, Case No. 6:09-bk-00914-ABB, (Bankr., Middle Dist. Fla., Orlando Div. 2009).

If you are looking for a New Jersey bankruptcy lawyer, please call (201) 676-0722.

Related articles by Zemanta
  • Bankruptcy filings up 22% in August vs. last year (abcnews.go.com)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Getting to know your NJ bankruptcy lawyer

Leave a reply
Meetings are sometimes held around conference ...
Image via Wikipedia

This post may not be about bankruptcy, but you can call your time spent reading this post “getting to know your New Jersey bankruptcy lawyer.”

So anyway, I just had a pretty cool experience – an old teacher of mine from high school connected with me on Facebook. Haven’t seen him since high school. He’s got a website featuring books he’s written about various aspects of the Scriptures. (Yes, I went to a Catholic high school.)

Believe me, when you are my age, you do not in a million years expect to grow up and discover that a high school teacher of yours went out and put up his own website featuring his own business and line of books. Oh, how the times change….

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]